Define retrieval evaluation fixtures and success criteria #19
Labels
No labels
area/deployment
area/governance
area/metadata
area/pipeline
area/search
type/data
type/design
type/implementation
type/testing
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Blocks
Depends on
Reference
Arkive/arkive#19
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Goal
Create queries with multiple relevant passages and documented relevance expectations.
Include wording variations and non-exact terminology.
Include language, domain, source, or other metadata-filter cases supported by the pilot records.
Include queries that should return no result.
Record expected source, document, chunk, and citation-location identifiers.
Define deterministic evaluation output and success criteria appropriate to a five-document corpus.
Keep the fixtures human-readable and reviewable.
Document that the evaluation measures retrieval only and does not involve an LLM.
Embeddings or vector evaluation.
Generated answers.
Large benchmark datasets.
Safety-critical retrieval evaluation.
Milestone 1 must be complete before this issue is implemented.
Every expected result resolves to a validated pilot chunk and source passage.
Relevance expectations are human-reviewed and documented.
Evaluation success criteria are deterministic and backend-neutral.
No LLM or network service is required.
Manually open every expected citation passage.
Review every no-result query for accidental relevant content.
Run the complete Milestone 1 test suite.